Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Stanley Kubrick Letter Threatens MGM Studio Head!

Stanley Kubrick Letter Threatens MGM Studio Head!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
11 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Barry Lyndon


    enigma_factory — 10 years ago(March 28, 2016 09:33 AM)

    It has been more than four decades since Stanley Kubrick blew minds with 2001: A Space Odyssey, and even to this day, nearly every frame of the 142-minute movie continues to obsess fans. So when this letter started making the rounds online everyone just believed it because of Stanleys reputation.
    Is Stanley Kubrick the biggest bad ass director to ever live? I like to think so and when this letter popped up I feel in love a bit more.
    The letter is dated 1970, and by time 2010 dropped in 1984, Kubrick had relaxed a bit, and given the film project his sort of half-blessing and even appeared in a cameo (as an illustration on a Time magazine cover). True or not, the letter is pretty AWESOME. Check it all out below!
    https://www.indiefilmhustle.com/stanley-kubrick-letter/

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      DaveBowman2001 — 9 years ago(April 20, 2016 11:58 AM)

      Hahahaawesomethanks for sharing that.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        jmillerdp — 9 years ago(July 03, 2016 07:32 PM)

        Kubrick was a violent, angry Jew. This letter is pretty funny. But, the way he treated Shelley Duvall while making "The Shining" wasn't.
        I. Drink. Your. Milkshake! [slurp!] I DRINK IT UP! - Daniel Plainview - There Will Be Blood

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          SerDarioTaranFulci — 9 years ago(July 04, 2016 07:14 PM)

          Antisemitism is also not funny He was a very gentle man who took extreme measure to bring out performances.
          The end always did justify the means however. He did some messed up things to most of his stars and they all said it was part of his genius and brought out some of their best work. Even Shelly Duvall, she said she would do it over again.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            NomadNomadovic — 9 years ago(September 30, 2016 01:44 PM)

            He was a very gentle man who took extreme measure to bring out performances.
            He was an abusive control freak, he abused his staff and actors.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              franzkabuki — 9 years ago(October 05, 2016 07:07 PM)

              "He did some messed up things to most of his stars".
              I would like to hear more about those "messed up things" because I'm quite unsure as to what they might have been - unless calling for an unusually high number of takes and generally being a demanding taskmaster qualify. I'm also unclear what exactly people think it is he did to Shelley Duvall - I'm sure he pushed her harder than most, but the documentary about the making of The Shining, for instance, certainly reveals no signs of any real abuse, instead showing a rather bitchy and uncooperative Duvall as well as Kubrick who is either sardonically ribbing at her or getting annoyed when she makes everybody wait on her. The impression one gets is that the two of them were engaged in some kind of subtle, undeclared battle of wills. Meanwhile, Nicholson reported of no problems with Kubrick whatsoever - could it be because he wasn't being problematic himself?
              "facts are stupid things" Ronald Reagan

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                IMDb User

                This message has been deleted.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  chefjoseph — 9 years ago(February 03, 2017 07:05 AM)

                  "A violent angry Jew" as opposed to a know- nothing Anti-Semetic Moron like yourself ? If you knew ANYTHING about Kubrick you would know that he was brought up in a household that was almost secular. They were NOT religious. He was also NEVER know to to be violent and rarely raised his voice. If you believe Duvall was treated poorly by him you know very little about the history of Directors and actors. That being said, the letter has been proven to be a fake.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    romarub — 9 years ago(February 03, 2017 01:02 PM)

                    Why do you confront jmillerdp as being an "Anti-Semitic moron", and rightfully so, I think, but then go on to make excuses for Kubrick, pointing out that he came from an "almost secular" household? For an Anti-Semite, it's not the practice of religion that counts so much as it is the genetic inheritance - which Kubrick couldn't, and probably wouldn't want to, change, even if he could.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      bregund — 9 years ago(July 04, 2016 03:48 PM)

                      The letter isn't real.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        wreckage-1 — 9 years ago(August 30, 2016 07:13 AM)

                        You just copied your comment from that website.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0

                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups