Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Did he actually die?

Did he actually die?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
15 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Walkabout


    dom-uk-freestuff — 13 years ago(April 21, 2012 06:03 PM)

    Everything I've read seems to suggest that the aborigine boy hanged himself and died. He clearly didn't hang himself- he is hanging by his arms, which are on the branches of the tree, not by a rope around his neck. Also, as the camera is on his face, just before the next scene, his mouth seems to twitch. So is he really dead?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      bokibongbing — 13 years ago(August 27, 2012 04:03 PM)

      The impression I got is that he was dead, but I suppose it's possible that he was alive. I didn't see him breathing.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        rmax304823 — 13 years ago(September 01, 2012 05:32 PM)

        Many of the tribes of Central Australia have a tradition of self-imposed death by unexplained means, probably something like fear- or depression-induced shock. They can "see death" in the eyes of someone who dislikes or rejects them. They die rather suddenly when they are "boned" by a sorcerer. It doesn't seem to be a myth. It's been attested to by Western doctors who have been unable to find a medical cause. I included some quotes from eye witnesses in an article called "Doomed Status" in the journal Psychiatric Quarterly from, I think, 1979, if you want to bother finding out more about it.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          Broadsman — 10 years ago(July 04, 2015 08:49 AM)

          The act of as you called it boning is really called pointing the bone.
          a leg bone of a emu or so I have been told is sharpen to a point at one end and certain herbs are placed in the hollow central channel.
          This can be pointed directly at the subject or can also be pointed at quite a distance in a few cases many many miles.
          So long as the tribal medicine man or witch doctor or sorcerer chants the name of the subject as it is being carried out.
          The subject does not need to hold any believe in the ceremony at all for this to work.
          Many white settlers who have had major falling out with local native Australian tribes have died soon after the bone pointing has been carried out.
          When in a couple of cases the post mortems were carried out nothing to explain the deaths that took place and the tribes claimed responsibility.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            IMDb User

            This message has been deleted.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              GuyOnTheLeft — 12 years ago(May 18, 2013 05:45 AM)

              He was definitely still alive when they last showed him.
              See a list of my favourite films here: http://www.flickchart.com/slackerinc

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                Royalcourtier — 12 years ago(May 18, 2013 04:47 PM)

                I think he was meant to be dead. The blow flies hanging around is a good indication of that. However if he was hanging by the arms, and twitched, that is just because they didn't want to actually kill the actor!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  GuyOnTheLeft — 12 years ago(May 18, 2013 04:58 PM)

                  He had flies on him throughout the movie. But based on the commentary track, I think it may be right that they intended for him to be dead. If so, they really screwed up and should have done another take or edited it better. The camera zooms in close to his face, he appears still and lifeless, but then at the end of the shot his eye very clearly moves, and not just slightly either. The effect it creates in film language is something we have all seen many times before: "Ha, you thought he was dead, but nopewe tricked you!"
                  See a list of my favourite films here: http://www.flickchart.com/slackerinc

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    huwdj — 12 years ago(December 08, 2013 01:35 PM)

                    Yes. In the film he died because she rejected him. In the book he died because he saw his death in her expression of disgust when she rejected him. He simply spread himself on a tree, as in the earlier scene when the aborigines placed the father in a tree, and willed himself to die. I've read examples of this in some societies though I don't think it's usually achieved that quickly.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      spookyrat1 — 12 years ago(December 11, 2013 05:50 AM)

                      Yes. In the film he died because she rejected him.
                      He was dead as a door nail, with the two suicides neatly meant to bookend the film I would think.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        lukn4frnz — 11 years ago(November 25, 2014 02:04 PM)

                        Based on the position of his neck (I backed up dvd and slowed it down to look closely) it sure looked like he'd asphyxiated himself. He neck was in an odd position and the rest of him was lifeless.
                        I liked how someone else pointed out the suicides at each end of film bookends the movie.
                        Man's despair

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          daburgundy — 11 years ago(March 08, 2015 08:04 AM)

                          (FILM)
                          The Black kid didnt die you can check it again he's still breathing or its acting flaws. someone said there were flies on the body but theyre ants from the mango tree. from what i see the aborigine didnt die but let himself suffer like the modern emos today.
                          Les Noir

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13

                            stuntmanmike — 11 years ago(March 16, 2015 10:03 PM)

                            He is 100% meant to be dead. If you think otherwise, you are wrong. If it in any way appears that he isn't dead it is because of an acting flub. The books discusses his reason for dying at length and is very fascinating. I recommend checking it out. It's a very short book, I once finished it in one sitting while waiting in an airport. Granted the film is "loosely" based on the book (in the book there is no father-suicide aspect and the kids are stranded by a plane-crash), however in the book the girl expresses fright over what she thinks are sexual advances from the boy. The only explanation the boy can come up with for why she would look at him with fear is that he has developed some sort of death-curse. In his culture, if the shaman told someone they were going to die then it would be willed into reality by the subject despite them having perfect health. There is also the less-interesting but more grounded theory that the boy had never had any contact with the germs of civilization and dies from catching an influenza or a cold from the others.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14

                              padzok — 10 years ago(January 31, 2016 02:39 AM)

                              He is 100% meant to be dead. If you think otherwise, you are wrong.
                              The makers might agree with your first sentence, but I'm sure they would disagree with your second.
                              His being physically alive at the end, but just outting himself in a pose of being symbolically dead to let the girl know that she should leave and not communicate with him further is a possibly valid interpretation of what we see.
                              She touches him. It seems reasonable to assume that she knows from the touch whether he is alive or dead.
                              If he is dead, then she is pretty callous, because she barely reacts.
                              If she is alive, then her reaction is consistent with her realising that she and her brother are now on their own in completing their journey back to the community she thinks of as "civilisation".

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fgadmin
                                wrote last edited by
                                #15

                                rkhen — 10 years ago(July 11, 2015 09:39 PM)

                                He's dead. At the beginning of the movie you see an Aboriginal band hang the body of the kids' dad up in a tree, under the arms, just like the boy does to himself in the end. That's how they bury the dead.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0

                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • Users
                                • Groups