Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. This message has been deleted.

This message has been deleted.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
8 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Elvis: That's the Way It Is


    IMDb User

    This message has been deleted.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Spinout78 — 17 years ago(August 14, 2008 05:04 PM)

      Why does it matter if he wrote it? Good music is good music, regardless of who writes it, records it, etc. When did Elvis ever take credit for anyone else's work? If he took credit, wouldn't all of his songs say HE wrote it? Besides, Elton John doesn't write his songs, is he a "phoney" too?
      He doesnt know to play the guitar properly
      Yeah? Bob Dylan doesn't know how to sing properly. Yet he was an amaing lyricist. Kind of like how Elvis is famous for his VOICE, nobody cares about his guitar playing
      The real songwriter deserves the name fame and money!!!
      They DO have fame and money. They get money from royalties for writing songs. And they are famous (at least, among Elvis fans who are actually aware (and don't need you to inform them) that Elvis didn't write his songs).
      Basically, all you said in your post is that you're the world's biggest, most un-informed dumbass.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        LarrupinLou — 16 years ago(May 02, 2009 07:24 AM)

        They DO have fame and money. They get money from royalties for writing songs. And they are famous (at least, among Elvis fans who are actually aware (and don't need you to inform them) that Elvis didn't write his songs).
        Besides, almost nobody would want to hear them sing their own songs instead of Elvis anyway.
        Basically, all you said in your post is that you're the world's biggest, most un-informed dumbass.
        That sums it up nicely. 🙂
        No blah, blah, blah!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          LarrupinLou — 16 years ago(May 02, 2009 07:20 AM)

          He doesnt know to play the guitar properly
          Judging by your spelling and grammatical errors in your post, I'm pretty sure that he could type better than you, however.
          BTW, does it count that he could play the piano fairly well?
          Oh, your understanding of the word "plagiarize" is laughable.
          If doping in sports is wrong(where people with no talent whatsoever..take drugs to enhance performance) then Elvis should be destroyed
          If you eliminated all of the entertainers who
          never
          have used drugs, who would be left? Not many, unfortunately. BTW, comparing what Elvis took with steroids is beyond asinine. Another thing: Elvis is not the Frankenstein Monster, so how do you "destroy" a person dead for over 30 years? 😉
          No blah, blah, blah!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            lesg2 — 16 years ago(January 08, 2010 08:49 PM)

            By this time, Elvis was becoming a joke, just going through the motions and riding out his fame to the end.
            Don't get me wrong, He is "The King Of Rock 'n Roll" but his best years were far behind him.
            Love The Oldies

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              ktowny — 16 years ago(January 09, 2010 09:27 AM)

              I would argue that at the time these concerts were performed, Elvis was trying to shake the taint of his awful movies of his back and making a serious attmept to get back to the stage.
              Consider he made some of his best recordings during this era, Suspicious Minds, If I Can Dream, In the Ghetto, etc. His 68 comeback put him back in the saddle. And the 1970 concerts were his return to the stage.
              Sure, he went downhill not too soon afterwards, but this movie shows his return to form. Check out how much he gets into his performance during the rehersals. That's not a guy going through the motions. Sure, some of his schtick on stage is a bit off, but he was having fun at this point and hadn't given up yet.
              And as far as cracking on the silly jumpsuit. Check out Jimmy Page in the Song Remains the Same. Its just as gaudy.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                LarrupinLou — 16 years ago(January 09, 2010 11:47 AM)

                And as far as cracking on the silly jumpsuit. Check out Jimmy Page in the Song Remains the Same. Its just as gaudy.
                Right. Elvis' wardrobe at the time wasn't that unusual for a rock star. It's only years later that it did it appear "silly," but that could also be said for many rockers of that time. 🙂
                No blah, blah, blah!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  LarrupinLou — 16 years ago(January 09, 2010 11:41 AM)

                  By this time, Elvis was becoming a joke, just going through the motions and riding out his fame to the end.
                  Don't get me wrong, He is "The King Of Rock 'n Roll" but his best years were far behind him.
                  I have to disagree with this. He starting becoming more robotic on stage after 1973 as his weight/health/drug problems increased, but he was still at the top of his game in 1970.
                  No blah, blah, blah!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0

                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • Users
                  • Groups