Really didn't like this film.
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Midnight Cowboy
mrjoelabs — 12 years ago(February 01, 2014 11:42 PM)
And I am movie snob, I hate most Hollywood blockbusters. But this movie was just dull and boring. Great acting but the plot struggled so much. And I can take in some long films. 2001 is one of my favorites, as is Clockwork Orange, Lawrence of Arabia, Apocalypse now etc. And for 60s counterculture films, I find Easy Rider miles ahead of this. This movie gave me the same feel as king of marvin gardens. Famous for one line, and in my view vastly overrated.
-
Deluge69-663-991830 — 12 years ago(February 07, 2014 02:33 PM)
I never cared much for it, inspite of all the hype and how "controversial" it was. Just because it had a "great reputation" doesn't necessarily make it great.
I really didn't like the characters. I felt intimidated into having to feel sympathy for these "lovable" misfit/hustlers. I even knew a few losers and clowns like them, and wasn't won over by all their phony 'bad ass' garbage.
Boring and just depressing.
And, just because a film is 'downbeat', doesn't always mean it is "deep". -
aldiboronti — 12 years ago(February 22, 2014 06:02 PM)
Oddly enough I'm of the exact opposite opinion, ie I find Easy Rider boring in the extreme while Midnight Cowboy is anything but. The Fonda/Hopper movie I did enjoy when it came out, although not nearly as much as MC, but I find it totally unwatchable today, save for Nicholson's brief appearance. Midnight Cowboy on the other hand is just as compelling now as when I first watched it in 69. Hoffman's acting is a tour de force, whereas the acting in Easy Rider is adequate at best (nobody ever accused Peter Fonda and Dennis Hopper of being great actors).
All a matter of opinion of course. -
tthomaslew76-234-269609 — 10 years ago(December 04, 2015 03:54 PM)
Threads like this make me wonder if some of the people who start them like film, understand film/direction/acting. B/c clearly no one with a knowledge of film and acting can say that this film is boring.
Even if you hate gays, Hoffman and Voight, and John Schlesinger, just seeing a 1960s New York City is interesting enough in itself to captivate an audience.
Oh,well can't please everybody I guess! -
sukhideol — 12 years ago(February 27, 2014 02:09 PM)
Just watched this movie for the first time and thought it was really good. I have to admit watching older movies is so much easier to watch. If find it very off putting when homeless or very poor characters have perfect straight white teeth, perfectly groomed eyebrows and coiffed hair. It was so much easier to immerse myself in these characters and their hardships.
-
Singingorilla — 11 years ago(April 18, 2014 11:48 AM)
I have to agree. I watched it last night for the first time. I wanted to see it because A) its reputation and B) I recently saw Coming Home and was stunned by Jon Voight. He was amazing in Coming Home and I had already seen Deliverance. I have no issues with "avant garde" films but imo this film did not deserve Best Picture. It was choppy and sloppy. I felt that everything (including the characters) were purposefully outrageous merely for shock value. It's a shame because it could've been a great character study.
I realize I'm in the minority here.
I like tacos, 71 Cabernet and my favorite color is magenta. -Fred -
Singingorilla — 11 years ago(April 21, 2014 09:12 AM)
How am I supposed to surmise anything about Rizzo besides the fact he is crippled and homeless? It's a totally flat character and I find it amazing the Hoffman was even nominated for this role.
I like tacos, 71 Cabernet and my favorite color is magenta. -Fred