The Remake

[fgadmin]

Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Far from the Madding Crowd

---

kstallings100 — 10 years ago(May 01, 2015 01:15 PM)

It isn't out yet, but the 3 male lead seem rather anemic compared to Bates, Finch and Stamp. That's a great lineup of manhood.

[fgadmin]

Tomatish — 10 years ago(May 05, 2015 08:39 AM)

NOT A REMAKE! It is an adaptation of the book!

[fgadmin]

gioconda91423 — 10 years ago(May 21, 2015 02:19 PM)

Of course the 2015 is a remake of the several films made as adaptations of the book.
If the 2015 version were not a remake, why of all the various interactions between Bathsheba & Frank is the scene with the sword redone?
Not worth arguing.
However to respond to OP, the men in the 2015 version are cardboard cutouts compared to Stamp/Bates & Finch.
No comparison really.

[fgadmin]

Noirdame79 — 10 years ago(June 30, 2015 10:11 PM)

Have you read the novel? The swordplay scene is in the book, and it is an important part of the courtship between Bathsheba and Troy, hence why it has been included in every adaptation - the 1967 film, the 1998 Masterpiece Theatre Miniseries, and this latest movie version. It is an adaptation of the book, and was adapted by David Nicholls.
People need to learn the difference between remakes and adaptations.

[fgadmin]

gioconda91423 — 10 years ago(June 30, 2015 10:53 PM)

You people are really obsessed with semantics.
Doesn't change a thing.
Whether or not you prefer the 2015 remake of the earlier adaptations is matter of personal preference.
The. End.

[fgadmin]

Noirdame79 — 10 years ago(July 01, 2015 08:44 AM)

I'm not talking about preferences. I'm stating that adaptations and remakes are not one and the same.

[fgadmin]

shepardjessica-1 — 10 years ago(January 03, 2016 01:21 PM)

I like both films and enjoy Christie's and Mulligan's performances equally. The male actors are much better in the Julie Christie version.

[fgadmin]

hdervic — 9 years ago(August 27, 2016 09:53 AM)

I agree that the 2015 cinematic adaptation is weak compared to the 1967 film version. I will say, however, Michael Sheen's Boldwood was a solid performance in an otherwise lackluster attempt at Hardy's story.

[fgadmin]

jrcjohnny99 — 9 years ago(January 31, 2017 10:09 AM)

Agree about Sheen, he is excellent in everything he does.
Mulligan however is almost hilariously miscast; one of the worst casting decisions of recent times.
I had really hoped Joe Wright might've taken a stab at it with Kiera Knightley and told his so about 5 or 6 years ago when the script started doing the rounds; He felt he couldn't make a better film than Schlesinger had, which I think says it all.