King Kong (2005)'s effects. Yay or Nay?

[fgadmin]

Soul_Venom — 4 years ago(August 21, 2021 10:56 PM)

Peter Jackson PERFECTED the King Kong story. Period.
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins!

[fgadmin]

atomicgirl — 4 years ago(August 23, 2021 02:11 AM)

The special effects are the worst thing about the movie and why Jackson's remake will always get a big fat goose egg from me. They are so bad that I'd rather see 100 hours of Rick Baker in a gorilla suit than see one second of CGI from the movie.

[fgadmin]

LorqVonRay1999 — 3 years ago(August 06, 2022 03:43 PM)

It's mostly yay but there are a few scenes with some spotty CGI.

[fgadmin]

cant jog, wont job — 3 years ago(August 06, 2022 04:42 PM)

They looked decent enough.

[fgadmin]

crimson moonfire — 3 years ago(August 06, 2022 06:36 PM)

I THINK KONG LOOKED LIKE !
What do you think about that? ANSWER ME BLIPPSTER! RIGHT NOW!

[fgadmin]

MissMargoChanning — 3 years ago(August 06, 2022 08:04 PM)

I think the CGI was terrific! Very realistic.
I still love the original 1930s film. It frightened me as a child. I still see the shear horror when Beauty gets her first look at the Beast!
I still admire what went into the special effects at that time.
As for the 1970s version???
I am a fan of Peter Jackson's film.
BEAUTIFUL….
You asked a pretty question; I've given you the ugly answer.
Fasten Your Seatbelts….
It's Going To Be A Bumpy Night!