Whedon vs. Abrams
-
Darwinskid — 12 years ago(August 18, 2013 07:20 PM)
I really like both I think I'll have to go with Whedon because he comes off like his own person and takes more time to deliver a more worthwhile project. Abrams these days seems to be trying to channel Spielberg as much as possible. I don't think we would see a show like Alias or Felicity from him in this day and age, it's all about being big with him. Oh, and lots of lens flares to boot.
I have an u2000nbelievably long ignore list. -
faded624 — 12 years ago(August 26, 2013 12:35 PM)
It's kind of an odd comparison I feel, Whedon develops shows and stays on them and writes them for the entirety of their run in a more writer-fashion, Abrams is a more producer type who conceptualizes and then hands it off entirely to others. His name is on a lot of projects that he doesn't have a huge influence on. Beyond the first two episodes of Lost, he didn't write much of that show, if any. I think the only show he stayed on and wrote was Felicity and Alias.
-
RottenBeauty — 12 years ago(August 29, 2013 08:33 AM)
I think it's am interesting one. I find I can enjoy Abrams works very easily, but often i find there is a certain sterile atmosphere in his work that makes it hard for me to connect with. I think he is better on television than on film, I find the characters in his films can be hard to connect with and understand.
Click On My Clicky Click!
www.nuketheshark.net -
Franco_Zed — 12 years ago(September 10, 2013 12:42 AM)
"I find I can enjoy Abrams works very easily, but often i find there is a certain sterile atmosphere in his work that makes it hard for me to connect with."
" I find the characters in his films can be hard to connect with and understand."
I'd never thought of that before but I totally agree with you.
There's generally more warmth and/or passion in Whedon's stuff.
All insults will be interpreted as an admission that you cannot contribute to the discussion.