Walz is a total nightmare
-
Lilith — 1 year ago(August 10, 2024 01:14 PM)
I agree, and the more I've heard him speak, the more dangerous I realize he is. I'm not finding him to be "moderate" at all, but rather, extremely progressive to a dangerous level for many of the reasons you listed.
I also cannot respect him for dodging his deployment and for his STOLEN VALOUR! That is reprehensible and given it's public knowledge, should disqualify him.
It's funny how Harris' talking points were all about how Trump was a risk to our democracy, yet the Harris/Walz ticket is proving to be an unbelievably dangerous threat to our democracy by curtailing our freedom of speech.
The fact that they support fast-tracking children to "transitioning" is dangerous and they're intent on taking away parental rights. The whole "snitching" on your neighbours is dystopian af.
Remember back when people thought those who didn't want the vaccine or questioned masks' efficacy were called conspiracy theorists and alarmists, and then we find out the vaccine came with dangerous and sometimes deathly side-effects, and masks were proven to not be effective. Those "conspiracy theorists" turned out to be right. As for Walz' take on "gender affirming care," if it's so correct, why is it that so many places are finally walking that back and recognizing how dangerous it really is. It is not reversible like they try and tell people. He talks about less government and staying out of peoples' lives, yet they both are intent on invading all of our lives.
I still want to watch what they're saying because I do listen to news from both sides of the aisle to see. It's really pathetic that Walz is spreading those couch rumours about Vance when it's been proven that started from a meme and isn't even true.
"Your emotional state is not my responsibility." – Warren Smith -
/. — 1 year ago(August 10, 2024 01:29 PM)
I also cannot respect him for dodging his deployment and for his STOLEN VALOUR! That is reprehensible and given it's public knowledge, should disqualify him.
He was 41. He wasn't going to see any combat. He would have been in some sort of command role given his high military rank. And he filed papers to retire in February of 2005 so that he could run for congress, 6 months before his unit was alerted it was going to Iraq. Please try to stop being wrong about everything. It makes you look like an idiot.
My password is password -
Lilith — 1 year ago(August 10, 2024 05:44 PM)
Have you watched any of the videos posted by both active and former Veterans with regards to their take on Walz's "service" which includes his stolen valour?
"Your emotional state is not my responsibility." – Warren Smith
Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 