A Mixed Race Is A Better Race
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Parminder Nagra
dmtjames — 19 years ago(August 12, 2006 06:37 PM)
Comments yes or no please. I say yes because it makes everyone understand that there are no barriers that should be put up so as to get in the way of understanding.
-
sandra_dee24 — 19 years ago(August 13, 2006 01:04 AM)
I think your use of the term 'better' is wrong. No race is 'better' than another. Who people choose to have children with (whether their partners be the same ethnicity as them or different) is upto each induvidual. Its good to encourage people to open their minds to other cultures but to say that creating a mixed race is for the best for everyone is wrong. Again, its all upto the induvidual
-
twisted_seraph — 19 years ago(August 16, 2006 12:47 PM)
In a way one mixed race for everyone sounds wonderful, but I think it would also bring some disappointing consequences. Think of some of the beautiful traditions that accompany certain peoples. After generations and generations of mixing so many of those cultures may cease to exist. Variety in humanity is a wonderful thing - we just have to start seeing it that way.
Also, I think one loving race would only ever work in theory. I think people would automatically start to look for differences (it seems to be the human way) although I guess if you want conflict there is always still religion.
Man created God in his own image. -
alexandra_caldwell — 18 years ago(June 04, 2007 04:05 PM)
After generations and generations of mixing so many of those cultures may cease to exist
Why? You don't get culture at birth. Race is irrelvant in that respect.
Putting this back on topic-ish (as it's well off topic in the first place) Parminder Nagra, for example, is as British as they come. -
vicky_lc2001 — 17 years ago(April 11, 2008 08:45 PM)
Actually, children of mixed ethnic background have more likelihood of being technically better in a genetic sense. As, wider genepool offers more favorable advantageous traits/genes than the inbred lot back in some deserted mountain or something for natural selection w/in an intra/inter-species competition for survival. Studies also show that people of non-African origin (for the past 150-200,000 years) have a much smaller genepool than Africans - meaning less variety amongst themselves, it is strange then, that these Africans who have suffered such a long and vast scale of discrimination actually, have a higher genetic probability of being shall we use the term, 'genetically superior' (?) than the rest of us. Interesting no? This would make a great research study actually, I wonder if I could actually explore this, whether tr2000ue or not? Hmmm:-/
Oh,WhatABigManYouAre! HeyLetMeBuyYouAPackOfGum,I'llShowYouHowToChewIt -
robken0174 — 13 years ago(September 27, 2012 04:37 PM)
Genetically superior?! Have you had another retard sandwich? Better genetic sense? What the hell are you going on about?! So I guess, in your pathetic eyes, someone who is 100% English or Irish or German is genetically inferior because they are all caucasian? Gee, that must explain why almost all of the inventions and technological advances made by man and the breakthroughs that have been for the betterment of man have been made and created by the white man, huh? Yeah, go take your "genetically superior" b.s. to Obama's living room.
There's no need to research such crap. It doesn't exist except in racist minds like yourself. Having a smaller gene pool means nothing. Look how far WE'VE moved the world forward. Read a book. Get a clue! -
vicky_lc2001 — 13 years ago(September 27, 2012 09:04 PM)
English & Irish are both mixed ethnicities. & I do't see how your president Obama has anything to do with this. As for Africa, well, they don't have the same resources Eurasians have, read the book Guns, Germs & Steel. I don't have time to explain everything to your bigoted background.
But I forget, you don't believe in research, studies, science, or reading a book. Bye.
Global Warming, it's a personal decision innit?Nigel Tufnel
-
Ceephax — 12 years ago(October 05, 2013 12:46 PM)
Actually, children of mixed ethnic background have more likelihood of being technically better in a genetic sense. As, wider genepool offers more favorable advantageous traits/genes than the inbred lot back in some deserted mountain or something for natural selection w/in an intra/inter-species competition for survival. Studies also show that people of non-African origin (for the past 150-200,000 years) have a much smaller genepool than Africans - meaning less variety amongst themselves, it is strange then, that these Africans who have suffered such a long and vast scale of discrimination actually, have a higher genetic probability of being shall we use the term, 'genetically superior' (?) than the rest of us. Interesting no? This would make a great research study actually, I wonder if I could actually explore this, whether true or not? Hmmm:-/
As someone who is mixed race myself, I can honestly tell you that your 'theory' is utter BULL. -
miss_brightside77 — 19 years ago(August 21, 2006 07:40 PM)
In my opinion, the only "race" I'm apart of is the human race. We all look the same and have the same insides and whatnot. That said, people should be able to procreate with whomever they choose; whether or not they're of the same ethnicity. I think multiethnic families are a wonderful thing and come with a lot of advantages, while still essentially being like other families. I wouldn't call them "better" than other families because they aren't.
Basically, I agree with what you mean. There should be no barriers. "Multiracial" couples, families and people are perfect examples of that.
Long live the rose that rose from concrete -
jellybeanzz — 19 years ago(October 09, 2006 05:54 PM)
I've noticed this, children of mixed races are beautiful. Plus outbreeding is always a plus health wise, mixing up the gene pools is always good. You only have to look at the products of inbreeding to know that.