Lame ass actress
-
prodigylover — 18 years ago(October 19, 2007 02:05 PM)
She's not a bad actress. She just made some bad choices. After SBTB, Tiffani wanted to remake her image with a badgirl, sexpot role (Valerie) on Beverly Hills, 90210 and now that's all she does and is probably offered.
It's a shame she has tons of natural charm as an actress. Too bad she couldn't have had a bigger part in a better Woody Allen movie. -
lukejbarnett — 4 years ago(November 01, 2021 08:36 AM)
just keep living in fantasy land you saying she's not a bad actress. if she's not a bad actress how come she was never and i mean never in anything good or great or important? natural charm? do you only watch lifetime movies?
bc she's such a bad subpar and cheesy actress that the only tings eh was ever in are straight to dvd lifetime like or streaming tv show things.
when the best thing you ever did was beverly hills 90210 you know you are a subpar and bad actress.
lukejbarnett -
murderXmayhemXmadness — 18 years ago(October 21, 2007 01:56 PM)
Actually, she was really great on 90210.
And what the hell is an astress? Anyone know? Opinions would be so much more meaningful if you didn't come across as a complete moron. Remember that.
The future is just a f-ing concept that we use to avoid being alive today. -
webgirl0428 — 18 years ago(April 03, 2008 05:16 AM)
I think she's very versatile. She went from playing sweet and innocent Kelly on Saved by the Bell to mean spirited Valerie on 90210. I think she's a very good actress. Also, if you don't like her, why are you viewing her IMDB page???
Whatever happens here, stays here. -
lukejbarnett — 4 years ago(November 01, 2021 08:32 AM)
exactly she never grew as an actress this is why she was never in anything big or important. her highest profile and biggest thing she was ever in was beverly hills 90210. which is such a perfect illustration of how bad of an actress she always has been. very cheesy actress.
lukejbarnett
