Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. "Jack and Jill"

"Jack and Jill"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
2 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Katie Holmes


    bijinius — 11 years ago(January 03, 2015 11:20 AM)

    She completely should have won that Razzie for "Worst Supporting Actress". by a WIDE margin. I couldn't believe how bad she was; of course she was given next-to-nothing to work with she was totally one of the most useless, horribly sexist portrayal of a woman on screen. She stares blankly at the screen, looking tired and boooored.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      chrisamon — 9 years ago(August 16, 2016 12:52 PM)

      "Jack and Jill"
      If that were she and I going up the hill, I'd gladly let her come down with the $2.50.
      Sometimes ya gotta wonder.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0

      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • Users
      • Groups